ORDER
Per Curiam:
Mr. Timothy Clay, Jr., appeals the denial of a 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call the codefen-dant to corroborate a self-defense theory. He also claims appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file surveillance video exhibits to support the insufficiency of evidence argument. We affirm. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).