PER CURIAM.
C.J.H. challenges his disposition and restitution orders. We affirm the disposition order without comment. But because the restitution order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence we reverse for a new restitution hearing. See Fernandez v. State, 98 So.3d 730, 731-32 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
CASANUEVA, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
. We find no merit in C.J.H.’s other challenge to the restitution award.