PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla.2011); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[R]eview of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson, 60 So.3d at 1051 n. 2. Appellant’s second claim is meritless as the alleged disproportionality between his sentence, and the sentence of his co-defendant, does not establish an “illegal sentence” cognizable under rule 3.800(a). Shivers v. State, 96 So.3d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
Affirmed.
GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.