TAYLOR, J.
1 1 The dispositive question raised for our review is whether a party must file a motion for default and give the adverse party notice under Rule 10 of the Rules for District Courts, 12 0.8.2011, ch. 2, app. (Rule 10), when the adverse party fails to file an answer or an. entry of appearance but physically appears at a hearing. We answer in the affirmative.
I. FACTS AND ALLEGATIONS
T 2 On June 4, 2010, Denise M. Schweigert (Mother) filed a petition for dissolution of her marriage to Tony W. Schweigert (Father) and an application for a temporary order. Mother sought both temporary and permanent custody .of the couples two children with supervised visitation with Father. On June 15, 2010, Father was personally served at CeeDees Country Store in Dustin, Oklahoma, with the summons, the petition for dissolution of marriage, the application for a temporary order, and the order for hearing. Father appeared at the hearing on August 9, 2010. However, he did not file an answer or entry of appearance.
T3 On August 8, 2011, one year after the temporary custody hearing, the August 9, 2010 order was filed, giving Mother temporary custody of the children, allowing Father supervised visitation as agreed by the parties, and setting the temporary child support of $288.01 per month. The temporary order acknowledged that the Respondent, TONY W. SCHWEIGERT, appeared] in person and Pro se at the hearing. The record fails to show that Father saw the temporary order or had a chanee to contest its contents before it was filed. The record also fails to show that a copy of the temporary order was ever sent to Father.
T4 In the meantime on August 2, 2011, Mothers attorney tendered a minute order setting the matter for default on August 24, 2011. Mother admits that she did not give Father notice of the hearing on taking default judgment. The divorcee decree was filed on the same day as the hearing. It stated that Respondent, TONY W. SCHWEIGERT, appears not and is in default .after having been properly served on June 15, 2010. Mother did not file a motion for default, and neither the decree nor any other document in the record says anything about any attempt to serve Father with notice of the hearing on the default judgment or whether his address was unknown. Nonetheless, Mother was granted a divorce, custody of the minor children with supervised visitation with Father, and child support of $283.01. Further, neither the transcript of the hearing for a temporary order nor the transcript of the August 24, 2011 hearing was designated for inclusion in the record, and the Court cannot ascertain what occurred during either hearing.
T5 On July 1, 2018, Father filed a motion to vacate the divorce decree based on fraud; and, on August 5, 2018, he filed an amended motion to vacate based on fraud and lack of due process. He contended that Mother defrauded him into not filing an answer and that he did not receive notice of the default hearing as required by Rule 10. Mothers response to the amended motion to vacate, like her response to the original motion to vacate, was in the form of an answer to a petition merely admitting or denying the allegations in the amended motion to vacate and was void of legal argument. At the hearing on the motion to vacate the default judgment, the district court stated: I dont think that just appearing in court triggers making an appearance. On December 17, 2013, a district court order was filed stating the matter came before the judge on October 22, 2013, denying the motion to vacate and finding Respondent failed to meet Rule 10 requirement of entry pursuant to 12 O.S. § 2005.2, and therefore Petitioner was not required to provide notice of default hearing to Respondent. Respondent appealed the denial of the motion to vacate, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. This Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari.
II. STANDARD OF REVIEW
16 This Court reviews a district courts order vacating or refusing to vacate a judgment for abuse of discretion. Ferguson Enters, Inc. v. H. Webb Enters., Inc., 2000 OK 78, ¶ 5, 13 P.3d 480, 482. Considerations in our review of an order vacating or refusing to vacate a default are: (1) the rule that default judgments are disfavored, (2) the decision to vacate a default judgment should be exercised so as to promote justice, and (8) refusal to vacate a default judgment requires a stronger showing of abuse of discretion than an order vacating a default judgment. Id. We are also mindful here that the default judgment impacted a fundamental right-a parents right to the companionship, care, custody, and management of his child. Barber v. Barber, 2008 OK 52, ¶ 9, 77 P.3d 576, 580.
17 Although this Court reviews a district courts denial of a motion to vacate for abuse of discretion, the order denying a motion to vacate, like a motion for a new trial, will be reversed if the district court erred with respect to an unmixed question of law. Jones, Givens, Gotcher & Bogan, P.C. v. Berger, 2002 OK 31, ¶ 5, 46 P.3d 698, 701. The district courts construction and application of Rule 10 to the undisputed facts before it presents a pure question of law subject to de novo review. Id.
III. ANALYSIS
T8 A district courts judgment shall be vacated and a new trial granted upon an aggrieved partys application for, among other things, an irregularity in the proceedings or courts order affecting the partys substantial rights. 12 0.8.2011, §§ 651(1), 1031(8). When Father asserts that Mother failed to file a motion for default judgment and give him notice as required by Rule 10, he is asserting an irregularity in the proceedings. See Knell v. Burnes, 1982 OK 35, ¶ 5, 645 P.2d 471, 473 (The rendition of a premature judgment is an irregularity which may be vacated under § 1081(8) if the rights of the party have been prejudiced because of a failure to adhere to the established rules or mode of procedure in the orderly administration of justice.).
19 Mother argues she was excused from giving Father notice of the default hearing because his address was unknown and he had not filed an entry of appearance. Relying on Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. H. Webb Enterprises, Inc., 2000 OK 78, ¶ 5, 13 P.3d 480, 482, Mother asserts that hardships, specifically the parties subsequent remarriages, warrant the denial of the motion to vacate. The record on appeal does not show that Mother asserted hardship as a reason for denying the motion to vacate in the trial court. With few exceptions, jurisdiction being one, a party who fails to assert a defense in the trial court is foreclosed from asserting it for the first time on appeal. Okla. Dept of Sec. v. Wilcox, 2011 OK 82, ¶ 17, 267 P.3d 106, 110. Further, Mother relies on a transcript which was not designated for inclusion in the record on appeal for the proposition that Fathers address was unknown. It was Mothers burden to produce a record supporting this allegation and the allegation that the parties have both remarried. Rule 1.28, Rules of the Supreme Court, 12 00.98.2011, ch. 15, app. 1; Phillips v. Hedges, 2005 OK 77, ¶ 15, 124 P.3d 227, 232. Because Mother failed in this regard, this Court will not consider Mothers argument as to these two assertions.
T10 Turning now to Fathers argument, we consider the meaning of the phrase made an appearance in Rule 10 which provides, in pertinent part:
In matters in default in which an appearance, general or special, has been made or a motion or pleading has been filed, default shall not be taken until a motion therefore has been filed in the case and five (5) days notice of the date of the hearing is mailed or delivered to the attorney of record for the party in default or to the party in default if he is unrepresented or his attorneys address is unknown. If the addresses of both the party and his attorney are unknown, the motion for default judgment may be heard and a default judgment rendered after the motion has been regularly set on the motion and demurrer docket. It shall be noted on the motion whether notice was given to the attorney of the party in default, to the party in default, or because their addresses are unknown, to neither.
Notice of taking default is not required where the defaulting party has not made an appearance....
Notice of taking default is not required under several other seenarios, and Mother does not assert that any of these are applicable here. Rather, Mother contends that the phrase made an appearance is the equivalent of filing an entry of appearance pursuant to Title 12, Section 2005.2.
111 When construing rules, as with statutes, we first look to the plain meaning of the provision. See W.R. Allison Enters., Inc. v. CompSource Okla., 2013 OK 24, ¶ 15, 301 P.3d 407, 412 (The primary goal in reviewing a statute is to ascertain legislative intent, if possible, from a reading of the statutory language in its plain and ordinary meaning.); McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co., 2006 OK 42, ¶ 17, 142 P.3d 390, 396 (Administrative rules, like statutes, are given a sensible construction bearing in mind the evils intended to be avoided.). If a provisions wording is unambiguous, its evident meaning must be accepted and there is no reason or justification for the use of interpretative devices to fabricate a different meaning. Hines v. Winters, 1957 OK 334, ¶ 0, 320 P.2d 1114, 1115 (Syllabus by the Court).
T12 Appearance is defined as coming into court as party to a suit. Blacks Low Dictionary 89 (5th ed.1979). When one makes a general appearance, the person is submitting to the jurisdiction of the court as if the person had been served with the petition and summons and cannot then contest the sufficiency of the proceedings notice. 12 0.8.2011, § 2004(C)(5) (An ace-knowledgment on the back of the summons or the voluntary appearance of a defendant is equivalent to service.); Porter v. Okla. Bacone Coll. Trust, 1959 OK 174, ¶ 7, 346 P.2d 335, 337 (Stating that when a party appears for any purpose, other than to contest jurisdiction, he enters a general appearance and waives the right to challenge jurisdiction). An appearance is any act, including partic-pation in a hearing for a temporary order, which brings the person under the courts jurisdiction.
{13 To make has a different meaning than to file. To file something means to deposit in the custody or among the records of a court, Blacks at 566, in this case filing an entry of appearance. To make or made does not require the formality of filing a document. The difference is seen in objections to evidence at trial. A party may make an objection by filing a motion in /- mine. Bierman v. Aramark Refreshment Servs., Inc., 2008 OK 29, ¶ 8, 198 P.3d 877, 880. A party also may make an objection to evidence or testimony at trial by orally interjecting the objection without the formality of filing a motion. Hair v. Wilson, 1964 OK 92, ¶¶ 13-15, 391 P.2d 789, 791-92. As illustrated, filing a motion in limine is one method of making an objection, it is not the only method. So filing a pleading or an entry of appearance are two methods of making an appearance; they are not the only methods. In contrast to Title 12, Section 2005.2s use of the phrase shall file an entry of appearance, (emphasis added), Rule 10s explicit requirement of filing a motion and giving notice of default is restricted to the defendants filing of an entry of appearance or pleading.
T 14 The differentiation of the two phrases, made an appearance and file an entry of appearance is supported by the history of Title 12, Section 2005.2 and Rule 10. Rule 10s requirement of filing a motion for default and notice of the hearing after the opposing partys appearance was adopted as part of the Rules for the District, Superior, and Common Pleas Courts of Oklahoma as early as 1961. 12 0.8.1961, ch. 2, app., r. 10. Although the statute was amended and changed to a rule, the motion and notice requirements after a partys appearance have continued through to the present. Title 12, Section 2005.2s requirement for filing an entry of appearance was not adopted until 2002. 2002 Sess. Laws 2278-2279 (ch. 468, § 22). Because Section 2005.2 was not adopted, and therefore did not exist, until after Rule 10, Rule 10s language of making an appearance cannot be limited to filing an entry of appearance pursuant to Section 2005.2.
{115 Rule 10s requirement for filing a motion and giving notice is applicable any time a party appears before a court, whether by filing a document or physically participating in a hearing. Rule 10 provides not only that a motion must be filed and notice given to a party who has appeared, but that the motion must be filed even if no notice was required. Rule 10 expressly provides:
If the addresses of both the party and his attorney are unknown, the motion for default judgment may be heard and a default judgment rendered after the motion has been regularly set on the motion and demurrer docket. It shall be noted on the motion whether notice was given to the attorney of the party in default, to the party in default or because their addresses are unknown to neither.
(Emphasis added.) This language mandates that a motion must be filed in all instances, even when a party fails to make an appearance, and the motion must recite what notice was given, and, if none were given, the reason therefore. Mothers failure was an irregularity in the proceedings that left the district court without means of determining whether she was required to give notice, and, if so, whether the notice conformed to due process prerequisites of entering judgment.
+ IV. CONCLUSION
T16 Mothers failure to file a motion for default and give notice to Father pursuant to Rule 10 after Father had appeared at the hearing for a temporary order was an irregularity in the proceeding. The district court erred in denying Fathers motion to vacate the divorce decree. The district courts order denying the motion to vacate is reversed and the cause is remanded to the district court. On remand, the district court is directed to revisit the motion to vacate in light of this opinion. The Court of Civil Appeals opinion is vacated.
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OPINION VACATED; DISTRICT COURTS ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE REVERSED AND WITH INSTRUCTIONS. REMANDED
Concur: REIF, C.J.; COMBS, V.C.J.,; and KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, TAYLOR, COLBERT, and GURICH, JJ.
Concurs Specially: EDMONDSON, J.
. An aggrieved party seeking a judgments vacation and new trial for an irregularity in the proceedings or order generally must commence the proceedings within three years. 12 O.S. 2011, § 1038. A court has authority to vacate a judgment after the three years if (1) Title 12, Section 696.2 requires a copy of the judgment be mailed to the moving party, (2) the moving party did not prepare the judgment, and (3) the court record fails to show that a copy of the judgment was mailed to the moving party within three days, exclusive of weekends and holidays after it was filed. Id. § 1031.1(B). Under these factors, the district court may vacate the judgment if the motion to vacate is filed no later than thirty days after the record shows that a copy of the judgment was mailed to the moving party. Id. Here the record fails to show that a copy of the judgment was ever mailed to Father or how he learned of the final divorce decrees entry.
Because Father was within the time limitations of Title 12, Section 1038 for filing the motion to vacate and the district court was within the time limits of Title 12, Section 1031.1, we need not address whether the divorce decree was void and subject to being vacated at any time.
. Even if Fathers address were unknown, Mother failed to utilize alternative methods of serving Father with notice of the default-judgment hearing. Title 12, Section 2005(A) provides that every written notice shall be served upon each of the parties. Subsection B provides that service is made by delivering a copy to the attorney or party at the last known address of the attorney or the party or by electronic means if the attorney or party has consented to electronic service. Subsection B continues: If no mailing address, physical address, or electronic address" for the attorney or party is known, service is effected by leaving it with the clerk of the court. Because the parties were married at one time, Mother should have had a last-known address for Father.
In like manner, Title 12, Section 696.2(B) requires, unless otherwise directed by the court, the attorney or party preparing a judgment to serve all parties, including those in default, with a file-stamped copy of the judgment within three days after the judgment is filed. If a party failed to appear, it is sufficient to mail a file-stamped copy of the judgment, decree or appealable order by first-class mail to the partys last-known address. Id. Only if a person in default was served initially by publication is the mailing requirement excused. Id.
. In 2013, the following language was added to Rule 10.
Once a party or an attorney provides an email address for service in a specific case in accordance with the Rules for Electronic Filing in the Oklahoma Courts, the provided email address shall serve as the appropriate address for purposes of notice as required by this rule, unless the filer is informed that the electronic transmission failed. See Rules for Electronic Filing in Oklahoma Courts. 2012 OK 61 [-- P.3d --].
. In Bovasso v. Sample, 1982 OK 84, ¶ 6, 649 P.2d 521, 523, the Court recognized that notice of taking default was not required where the defendant had not entered an appearance in the case and had filed no pleadings therein. This is consistent with our construction of Rule 10. This Court did not use the phrase filed an appearance, choosing instead the phrase entered an appearance, and there was no intimation that the defendant had appeared in open court.
. Rules for the District, Superior and Common Pleas Courts of Oklahoma, Rule 10 provided:
In all matters in default in which an appearance has been made by the defaulting party or by an attorney, or a pleading filed, default judgment shall not be taken until a motion therefor has been filed in the case. and five (5) days notice thereof given to the party in default or his attorney, which fact shall be noted on the motion. If the address of the party or attorney is unknown, then the motion may be heard and default judgment rendered after the same has been regularly set on the motion and demurrer docket. When a case has been regularly set for hearing on a pre-trial conference or trial docket, default judgment may be rendered for any party on the hearing date without further service of notice.
. Likewise, the provision making acknowledgment on the back of the summons or the voluntary appearance of a defendant equivalent to service was in effect long before Title 12, Section 2005.2. See Okla. Stat. ch. 2, art. VII, § 175 (1931). © .