LAW.coLAW.co

J.A.K., Appellant, v. K.L.K., Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals2015-01-13No. No. ED 101571
456 S.W.3d 60

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

J.A.K. appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify his obligation to pay maintenance to K.L.K. (“Respondent”) and awarding Respondent attorney’s fees. We find no error has occurred. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).