PER CURIAM.
Larry Charles Williams seeks review of the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Williams v. State, 127 So.3d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), on the assertion that it expressly and directly conflicts with the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Shackelford v. State, 579 So.2d 306 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), and the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Stanton v. State, 576 So.2d 925 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), on a question of law. We initially granted the petition for review. However, after reviewing the limited record in this case, and conducting oral argument, we have determined that review was improvidently granted. Thus, we discharge jurisdiction of this cause.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.