PER CURIAM.
The order denying appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence is affirmed. An alleged error in the procedures used in imposing an enhanced sentence does not result in an “illegal sentence” that can be corrected at any time under rule 3.800(a). Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117, 120 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (citing Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246, 1251 (Fla.2001)). WARNER, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.