LAW.coLAW.co

Eileen HAMALL-DESAI, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit2006-02-02No. No. 05-11869
164 F. App'x 963

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.

. 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides:

When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist:

(a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous;

(b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record;

(e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.