ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Reginald Perkins appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of resisting arrest. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in accepting the jury’s verdict as to resisting arrest. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).