PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The motion for postconviction relief was untimely. In addition, it is without merit. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The motion for postconviction relief was untimely. In addition, it is without merit. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). WARNER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.