PER CURIAM.
See Williams v. State, 768 So.2d 1281, 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“Given the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced by the state, we cannot find that the denial of the appellant’s motion for a continuance during trial, in order to locate a defense witness, caused any material prejudice to the appellant particularly when it is unknown whether the witnesses’ testimony would have been favorable to the appellant.”). AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.