PER CURIAM.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and denying the motion for rehearing as untimely. Because the motion for rehearing was untimely, it did not toll the rendition of the final order for purposes of seeking this appeal. Fla. RApp. P. 9.020(h). This appeal is thus untimely and is DISMISSED. Gary v. State, 5 So.3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).
PADOVANO, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.