PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994) (holding invocation of right to an attorney must be unambiguous and unequivocal); accord Alvarez v. State, 890 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 459, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994) (holding invocation of right to an attorney must be unambiguous and unequivocal); accord Alvarez v. State, 890 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).