LAW.coLAW.co

ARTHUR W. TIFFORD, P.A., and Tifford and Tifford, P.A., Appellants, v. LITIGATION CONCEPTS, L.C., et al., Appellees

Florida District Court of Appeal2012-06-06No. Nos. 3D10-2045, 3D10-2044, 3D10-1277
89 So. 3d 1072

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, holding that the trial court properly entered final summary judgment in favor of appellees on appellants’ claims for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. See Faro v. Romani, 641 So.2d 69, 71 (Fla.1994) (holding “when an attorney withdraws from representation upon his own volition, and the contingency has not occurred, the attorney forfeits all rights to compensation.”).

We likewise affirm the trial court’s orders denying each party’s motion for sanctions pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (2010), finding no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s determinations.

Affirmed.