LAW.coLAW.co

In re Carlos VILLARREAL, Relator

Texas Courts of Appeals2010-01-13No. No. 05-10-00023-CV
303 S.W.3d 892

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

OPINION NUNC PRO TUNC

Opinion by

Justice FILLMORE.

Relator contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to compel arbitration. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has an adequate remedy on appeal. See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.016 (Vernon Supp. 2009); Tex. R.App. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.2004) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. As a result of this ruling, relator’s Motion for Temporary Relief Pending Writ of Mandamus is MOOT.