ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Goins (“Husband”) appeals from the judgment of modification decreasing his monthly child support obligation. We find that the trial court did not err in its modification of Husband’s monthly child support obligation. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).