ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael 0. Smith (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, following a bench trial, convicting him of one count of resisting a lawful detention and one count of assaulting a police officer in the third-degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).