Order
PER CURIAM.
David Wiglesworth appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion to vacate his guilty plea, following an evidentiary hearing. Wiglesworth contends his plea was not knowing and voluntary because he claims to have reasonably believed his attorney had abandoned representation. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief. AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).