ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Lonzo Cason (hereinafter, “Movant”) pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree, Section 569.030 RSMo (2000) and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Movant was sentenced as a prior offender to two concurrent terms of ten years’ imprisonment. Movant now appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant raises one point on appeal, alleging the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion because his plea counsel failed to investigate the existence of a bus stop.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
. All further statutory references herein are to RSMo (2000).