ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Torrey Lindsey appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree trafficking. We find that the trial court did not err in overruling Lindsey’s objection to testimony regarding an anonymous tip, nor did the court err in excluding certain testimony at trial. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).