ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Patrick Coyne (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of stealing and third-degree assault.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.26(b).