LAW.coLAW.co

In the Interest of: C.L.K, Jr.; O.R.M.; A.D.S.; T.W.S.; and R.E.S.

Missouri Court of Appeals2009-03-24No. No. ED 92057
279 S.W.3d 240

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

P.M. and B.M. appeal from the trial court’s termination of their parental rights. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. In re A.S.O., 52 S.W.3d 59, 63 (Mo.App. W.D. 2001). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).