PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla.2003) (“Collateral es-toppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion.”).
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 291 (Fla.2003) (“Collateral es-toppel ... precludes a defendant from rearguing in a successive rule 3.800 motion the same issue argued in a prior motion.”).