PER CURIAM.
The trial court’s order summarily denying King’s Rule 3.800(a) motion seeking additional jail time credit is affirmed without prejudice to King’s right to file a facially sufficient Rule 3.800(a) motion. See Hinlcel v. State, 937 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA2006). AFFIRMED.
PALMER, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.