LAW.coLAW.co

Garrett M. MARSHALL, Employee, v. STEINBRECHER PAINTING, INC., and Meadowbrook Claims Services, Relators, and Minnesota Department of Labor & Industry, Workers Compensation Division, Respondent

Minnesota Supreme Court2009-01-28No. No. A08-1673
759 N.W.2d 891

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed August 26, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT:

/s/Eric J. Magnuson Chief Justice