IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
SPANISH HEIGHTS ACQUISITION No. 83526
COMPANY, LLC; AND SJC VENTURES
HO:WING COMPANY, LLC d/b/a SJC
VENTURES, LLC,
Petitioners,
vs.
THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH FILE
GONZALEZ, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SEP 0 2021
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, Et-UAW A. SPOWN
CLEP F PRENE COUR
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF EY dir
DEN., CLERK
CLARK,
Respondents,
and
CBC PARTNERS I, LLC; 5148 SPANISH
HEIGHTS, LLC; KENNETH ANTOS;
AND SHEILA NEUMANN-ANTOS,
Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition
ch.allenges a district court order appointing a receiver and the court's
refusal to grant injunction relief.
An appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding
writ relief. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d
840, 841 (2004); see NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. Since an order appointing a
receiver is appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(4) and an order denying an
injunction is appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(3), petitioners have an
adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the district court's
orders. See NRA.P 4(a)(1) (stating that the notice of appeal must be filed
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEvADA
11 MI7/5 001&.•
within 30 days from the date when written notice of entry of the order
appealed from is served). Indeed, it appears that petitioners have appealed
from the challenged orders, see Spanish Heights Acquisition Co., LLC v.
CBC Partners I; LLC, Docket Nos. 82868 & 83407, and petitioners have not
argued or demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is nevertheless
warranted to review these orders. Thus, we decline to consider this petition
for extraordinary writ relief, NRAP 21(1); Smith u. Eighth Judicial Dist.
Court, 1.07 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1994 and we
ORDER the petition DENIED.1
A • C.J.
Haridesty
A104)(1‘..0 , J.
Stiglich
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge
lion. Joanna Kishner, District Judge
Maier Gutierrez & Associates
Mushkin & Coppedge
.Eighth District Court Clerk
qn light of this order, petitioners emergency motion for stay, as well
as real parties in interest's motion to extend the deadline to respond to the
stay motion past the requested relief date, are denied as moot. SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
top 194 ift .11.1g1D