LAW.coLAW.co

Commonwealth v. Gray, Appellant

Superior Court of Pennsylvania1978-02-07No. Appeal, No. 1599
252 Pa. Super. 621382 A.2d 748

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence vacated. The case is remanded for the entry of post-trial motions nunc pro tunc.

JACOBS and PRICE, JJ., dissent.

VAN der VOORT, J., dissents and would remand to the lower court for a determination of whether appellant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to file post-trial motions. Commonwealth v. Tate, 464 Pa. 25, 346 A.2d 1 (1975); Commonwealth v. Schroth, 458 Pa. 233, 328 A.2d 168 (1974).