COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Albert MOORE, Appellant

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J.,

dissents on the grounds that the information contained in the search warrant was stale. See Commonwealth v. Shaw, 444 Pa. 110, 281 A.2d 897 (1971).

SPAETH, J.,

dissents. The warrant was tainted by a material misstatement of fact. See Commonwealth v. Smith, 250 Pa.Super. 436, 378 A.2d 1015 (1977). WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.