LAW.coLAW.co

JOHN EHRHARDT, Respondent, v. A. CURRY, Appellant

Supreme Court of Nevada1872-01
7 Nev. 221

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

By the Court,

Garber, J.:

In this ease the only assignment which is even plausible, is that the judgment is for five dollars more than the sum px-ayed for and shown to be due by the findings and complaint. This was clearly a clerical erx’or, or the result of a mistake in computing the iixterest. The attention of the court below should have been called to the mistake, and a motion there made to correct it. Under the circumstances, the point cannot be made in this court. 5 Cal. 417; 20 N. Y. 498. The judgment is affirmed, with costs.