Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented on the ground that Pa.R.C.P. 2252 permits joinder under these facts. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this cáse.
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.
Order affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented on the ground that Pa.R.C.P. 2252 permits joinder under these facts. WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this cáse.