COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Jerome HARRIS, Appellant

PER CURIAM:

The six Judges who decided this case being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed. JACOBS, President Judge, and SPAETH, J., dissent.

HOFFMAN, J.,

dissents because the Commonwealth improperly used prior convictions to attack appellant’s credibility. See Commonwealth v. Moore, 246 Pa.Super. 163, 369 A.2d 862 (1977). WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.