Supreme Court of Missouri, 1852
78 opinions
- HOLLIDAY admr. of FUCHS vs. DOYON 1852-01
- SMITHS exr vs. BENTON 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. HADEN 1852-01
- SMITH vs. BUSBY 1852-01
- DAVIS Admr. vs. SMITH & BRADLEY 1852-01
- DENNIS vs. ASHLEYS Administrators 1852-01
- NELSON & OBRYAN, trustees of NELSON vs. JAMES RUSSELLS administrators 1852-01
- MIDDLETON & RILEY vs. HOFF 1852-01
- DUNNICA vs. THOMAS Admr 1852-01
- HUGHES vs. WOOSLEY 1852-01
- DAVIS & ALLEN vs. FOSTER 1852-01
- STATE vs. LADD 1852-01
- GULLETT vs. HOY & ORTON 1852-01
- ROBINSONS Exrs, vs. ROBARDS 1852-01
- YOUNT et al. vs. YOUNT et al. 1852-01
- VEAL vs. CHARITON COUNTY COURT 1852-01
- CASON vs. MURRAY 1852-01
- YELDELL & BANRES vs. STEMMONS 1852-01
- WALDEN vs. VALIANT 1852-01
- HEATHS admr vs. ASHLEYS admr et al. 1852-01
- HOLLIDAY vs. LEWIS 1852-01
- MOONEY vs. WILLIAMS 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. OWEN 1852-01
- JOHNSON vs. McGRUDER 1852-01
- PRICE vs. JOHNSON COUNTY 1852-01
- HOLLAND vs. HUNTON & WHITE 1852-01
- SELF v. GARDNER 1852-01
- GOBIN vs. HUDGENS 1852-01
- STOALLINGS vs. BAKER & YOUNG 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. FLOYD 1852-01
- WALLS guardian vs. COPPEDGE 1852-01
- WOODS et al. vs. RAINEY 1852-01
- CARGILL & OWEN vs. CORBY 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. HENDERSON & POWERS 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. WISHON 1852-01
- THE STATE, use of Blantons Admr. vs. HUNTER et al. 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. HORNBEAK 1852-01
- WOODS et al. vs. FREEMAN, guardian of RAINEY 1852-01
- TOLSONS Admr. vs. GARNER 1852-01
- STATE vs. SWADLEY 1852-01
- KUYKENDALL, use of MIDDLETON, PERRY & CO. vs. McDONALD & VINEYARD 1852-01
- STATE vs. STONE 1852-01
- DAVIS & ALLEN vs. FOSTER 1852-01
- BELL vs. HOAGLAND 1852-01
- CROW et al. vs. MARSHALL 1852-01
- WOOLDRIDGE, Admr. of McDONALD vs. DRAPER, Admr. of McDONALD 1852-01
- THE STATE to the use of RENFROS admrs. vs. PRICE and LUSK 1852-01
- THE STATE, to the use of Cowan, vs. MODRELL, et al. 1852-01
- SKINNER vs. ELLINGTON 1852-01
- DONNELL vs. BUSBY 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. HUTSON 1852-01
- THE STATE vs. PUGH 1852-01
- ST. LOUIS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION vs. THE. CITY OF ST. LOUIS 1852-03
- KINGSLAND & KINGSLAND vs. WORSHAM & ROBINSON 1852-03
- LAMBAR vs. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS 1852-03
- MURRAY vs. LAFTEN, et al. 1852-03
- STATE vs. HALE 1852-03
- SAPINGTON vs. JEFFRIES 1852-03
- RIDDICK vs. WALSH 1852-03
- WILKERSON vs. MOULDER 1852-03
- BENOIST, et al., vs. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS 1852-03
- PHILLIPS vs. SMOOT 1852-03
- MARION COUNTY vs. MOFFETT, Admr. of SAMUELS 1852-03
- HARPER vs. HUNTER & HAMILTON 1852-03
- WITHERS, to use of MADDOX, vs. SHROPSHIRE 1852-03
- DRAHER vs. SCHREIBER 1852-03
- HOFFMAN vs. CITY OF ST. LOUIS 1852-03
- DOBYNS vs. McGOVERN, et al. 1852-03
- CALVERT vs. STEAMBOAT TIMOLEON 1852-03
- MUNFORD vs. WILSON et al. 1852-03
- BOURNE, CLERK OF HANNIBAL COURT OF COMMON PLEAS vs. COUNTY COURT OF MARION COUNTY 1852-03
- THE CITY OF HANNIBAL vs. DRAPER 1852-03
- SCOTT, a man of color, vs. EMERSON 1852-03
- DRAPER to use of CLIFTON vs. OWSLEY 1852-03
- WALKER, appellant, vs. THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, respondent 1852-03
- FROUST vs. BRUTON, admr of LEE 1852-03
- KENNERLY et al. vs. SHEPLEY 1852-03
- HAMILTON vs. JEFFRIES 1852-03