Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1859
158 opinions
- Soohan versus Philadelphia 1859
- Aments Executor versus Wolf 1859
- Hood versus Hood 1859
- Reed versus Penroses Executors 1859
- Livingston versus Pittsburgh and Steubenville Railroad Company 1859
- Cook versus Haggerty 1859
- Alexander versus Kennedy 1859
- Chews Appeal 1859
- The Delaware Insurance Company versus The Quaker City Insurance Company; The Delaware Insurance Company versus The Commonwealth Insurance Company 1859
- Glading versus George 1859
- Cooper et al. versus Bickford 1859
- Woods Executor versus Colwell 1859
- Graham versus Grahams Executors 1859
- Shoenbergers Executors versus Zook et ux. 1859
- Lindermans Executors versus Guldin et al. 1859
- Phillipss Appeal 1859
- Peterson et al. versus Lothrop; The Same versus The Same 1859
- Daviss Appeal 1859
- Cleaver et al., Commissioners of Washington Co. versus The Commonwealth ex rel. Porter et al. 1859
- Russells Administrators Appeal 1859
- Stokely versus Thompson 1859
- Charltons Appeal 1859
- Wharton versus Garvin 1859
- Younkin versus Cowan 1859
- De France et al. versus De France et al. 1859
- Sturtevants Appeal 1859
- Heyers Appeal 1859
- Gilleland et al. versus Rhoads 1859
- Curtis versus Cook 1859
- Williams versus The Commonwealth 1859
- Eagan versus Call 1859
- The Pittsburgh and Steubenville Railroad Company versus Biggar 1859
- Minium versus Hoig 1859
- Baskins Appeal 1859
- Myers et al. versus The Commonwealth 1859
- Markss Appeal 1859
- Shenango Township versus Wayne Township 1859
- Sykes versus The Perry County Mutual Fire Insurance Company 1859
- Warfel versus Cochran et al. 1859
- Junk versus Canon 1859
- Drum versus Kelly 1859
- Walsh versus Kelly 1859
- King versus Nimick et al. 1859
- McCulloughs Appeal 1859
- Hoy versus Gronoble 1859
- The Borough of Uniontown versus The Commonwealth ex rel. Veech 1859
- The County of Allegheny versus Shaw et al. 1859
- Walker versus Hall 1859
- The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co. versus Hoge 1859
- Smith versus Derrs Administrators 1859
- Wilson et al. versus Shoenbergers Executors 1859
- Washabaugh et al. versus Entriken 1859
- Van Dresor versus King 1859
- Commonwealth versus Horner 1859
- Wilson Blacks Executor versus Marcus Blacks Executors 1859
- Commonwealth ex rel. Barr versus Naylor 1859
- Donnel et al. versus Bellas 1859
- Moores Appeals 1859
- Irwin et al. versus Irwin et al. 1859
- Fulton versus Hood et al. 1859
- Driesbach versus Becker et al. 1859
- White versus Heylman 1859
- Galways Appeal 1859
- Palmer versus The Ridge Mining Company; The Same versus The Same 1859
- Merklein versus Trapnell et al. 1859
- Dumars versus Miller 1859
- McCracken versus Elder 1859
- The Directors of the Poor of Westmoreland County versus The Overseers of Conemaugh Township 1859
- Sterner versus Palmer; Penny versus The Same 1859
- Nagle versus Mullison 1859
- Guldin versus Lindermans Executors 1859
- Boardman versus Dean 1859
- Chubb versus Gsell 1859
- Bavington versus The Pittsburgh and Steubenville Railroad Company 1859
- Canon versus Campbell 1859
- Hertzog versus Hertzogs Administrator 1859
- Prays Appeals 1859
- Bannon et al. versus Brandon 1859
- The Commonwealth versus Nesbit 1859
- Ogden et al. versus Porterfield 1859
- Kase versus Kase 1859
- The Independent Mutual Insurance Company versus Agnew 1859
- Patterson versus Moores Executors 1859
- Hall et al. versus Logan 1859
- Groft et al. versus Weakland et al. 1859
- Ormsby et al. versus Ihmsen 1859
- The Commonwealth versus Reed et al. 1859
- Hancocks Appeal 1859
- Johnson et al. versus McCue et al. 1859
- Stinemans Appeal 1859
- Fishers Appeal 1859
- Williamss Administratrix versus Williams 1859
- Aurands Appeal 1859
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hamilton versus The Select and Common Councils of the City of Pittsburgh 1859
- Tobin versus Gregg et al. 1859
- Road in Chartiers Township 1859
- Green et al. versus Watson et al. 1859
- Wier versus Myers 1859
- Killion et al. versus Wright 1859
- Wynn versus Bellas 1859
- Shoops Appeal 1859
- Robinson versus English 1859
- Hartranft versus Hesser et ux. 1859
- Hogg versus Orgill 1859
- Mish versus Wood et ux. 1859
- The Commonwealth versus Justice et al. 1859
- Morrisons Administrator versus Mullin 1859
- Patten versus Wilson 1859
- Commonwealth versus Wilson 1859
- Bowmans Appeal 1859
- Work et al. versus Kase 1859
- Springer versus Walters 1859
- Reeds Appeal 1859
- Kunss Executor versus Young et al. 1859
- Yeagers Appeal 1859
- Seebold et al. versus Shitler et al.; The Same versus Oldt et al. 1859
- Rileys Appeal 1859
- Anshutzs Appeal 1859
- Stokely versus Robinson 1859
- Newman et al. versus Edwards 1859
- Schrack versus Zubler 1859
- Kinley versus Crane et al. 1859
- The Commonwealths Appeal. Averys Estate 1859
- Killpatrick versus Frost et al. 1859-01-02
- Johnstons Administrators versus Johnston 1859-01-03
- Lines Appeal 1859-01-03
- OHara versus Pennsylvania Railroad Company 1859-01-03
- Garrisons Appeal 1859-01-03
- Black versus Aber 1859-01-03
- Baker versus King; Nimick & Co., Garnishees of Baker, versus King 1859-01-03
- Shoofstall versus Adams 1859-01-03
- Baileys Appeal 1859-01-03
- Warnick et al. versus Grosholz 1859-01-13
- Molony versus Benners 1859-01-13
- Voegtly versus Pittsburgh and Fort Wayne Railroad Company 1859-01-30
- Millers Appeal 1859-02-01
- Price versus McCallister 1859-02-01
- Mechlings Appeal 1859-02-07
- Sharps Appeal 1859-02-16
- Belt versus Ferguson 1859-02-28
- Stearlys Appeal 1859-02-28
- Bank of Northern Liberties versus Munford 1859-02-28
- Glenn versus Davis 1859-03-04
- Demarest versus McKee et al. 1859-03-14
- Chew versus Chew 1859-03-14
- Green versus Scarlett 1859-03-14
- Johnston versus Beckham 1859-03-28
- Road in Reserve Township 1859-03-29
- Wethrills Appeal 1859-05-04
- Hartmans Appeal 1859-05-04
- Hall et al. versus Lacey et al. 1859-05-06
- Ballard versus Fitch 1859-05-06
- Bartle versus Vosbury et al. 1859-05-11
- Thompson et al. versus Bank of Gettysburg 1859-06-30
- Commonwealth versus Jeandell 1859-07-23
- Hole versus Rittenhouse 1859-10
- Bowman et al. versus The Cecil Bank 1859-10-20
- Putney versus Collins et al. 1859-11-07